4 ms·
I'm very curious about how you consider GPT-4 an existential threat. Most people don't have the know-how to hook it up to survey results.
by zamalek 4y ago
I'm very curious about how you consider GPT-4 an existential threat. Most people don't have the know-how to hook it up to survey results.
- coldtea 4y agoDoesn't matter, tons of companies will, and offer an easy interface.
- rcme 4y agoThis company is already in the space before the "tons of [other] companies." Seems like they have a head start.
- coldtea 4y agoThe technology they developed on that space has been superceded and deprecated. They once had a tech advantage, or so they thought, now they'd at best have a front-end to a widely available technology controlled by a third party.
- zamalek 4y agoThat doesn't add any value at all to the conversation. They had a head start, even if tons of companies "will," they "do." Also, given the context limitations of transformers, the value in using a transformer here might be extremely dubious.
- coldtea 4y agoA head-start on the, now deprecated, tech they were implementing. Not on the interface and business idea, which is much more easier to replicate. From a company with a tech advantage, one that they hoped to capitalize, they are now just a team with a front-end on what's now a publicly availabe commoditized technology - one where a third party controls the state of the art even. It's a totally different business proposition, and a much less winning one. Not some VC money getting one either.