>fraudulent to portray the interview as real how is that different to the reporting on the Oasis lost tapes made by AI? Where they first exclaim "Oasis is back

>fraudulent to portray the interview as real how is that different to the reporting on the Oasis lost tapes made by AI? Where they first exclaim "Oasis is back! Except, not really." [1][2] Seems it depends how far you read into any story and how deep they bury the lede. Of course the wrag magazine was more egregious in their presentation elsewhere but other than the tastelessness of it all I don't see much different than printing "what would jesus do about your horoscope? NO REALLY! we asked him" whereas with Schumacher they are tongue-in-cheek conflating the idea that AI chatbots are uploaded consciousnesses and so desirable quote factories for their dwindling empire. [1] https://decrypt.co/137160/ai-oasis-aisis-breezer-liam-gallagher-music-copyright https://decrypt.co/137160/ai-oasis-aisis-breezer-liam-gallag... [2] https://www.stereogum.com/2220920/oasis-ai-album-liam-gallagher/news/ https://www.stereogum.com/2220920/oasis-ai-album-liam-gallag...