3 ms·

I guess? But you wouldn't say a recovering anorexic that relapsed has a "weight gain relapse"? Or someone with cancer having it reoccur as a "tumour free rela

• sidfthec 4y ago
  Yeah because that's not what "relapse" means. Some definitions I found: - suffer deterioration after a period of improvement. - a deterioration in someone's state of health after a temporary improvement. - to slip or fall back into a former worse state - a recurrence of symptoms of a disease after a period of improvement
• lcnPylGDnU4H9OF 4y ago
  Losing weight might actually be a relapse for a recovering anorexic. The "relapse" from being tumor-free would indeed be a weird thing to talk about, though not strictly wrong if the cancer had previously been in remission. > The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that perfluorinated alkylate substance (PFAS) exposures are associated with body weight increases in a dietary intervention study. The phrase appears to be intended to mean the same thing as "body weight increases in a dietary intervention" which seems to describe a relapse, assuming that the purpose of "dietary intervention" is to lose weight. Edit: I guess the first sentence of this comment doesn't actually answer the question it's intending to. To the point of the question, maybe it would be weird to say that a relapsed anorexic had a "weight gain relapse" but only if it would be weird to say they are on a "weight gain treatment".