3 ms·
> These arguments aren't mine. You're attempting to colour my words by associating them with someone else's who they apparently "sound like." I didn't say they
by w4ffl35 3y ago
> These arguments aren't mine. You're attempting to colour my words by associating them with someone else's who they apparently "sound like."
I didn't say they are. You stated you didn't know what I was talking about, I explained. No one is attempting to color your words as anything. You made a statement regarding the harm AI is doing to women and I'm saying that it echos the sentiment of a congresswoman who I deeply disagree with.
> This is a strawman.
no, it isn't a strawman when that is literally the issue on the table. Congresswoman Eshoo as I stated wants to use state power to ban Stable Diffusion, and she's using the same argument you're using. The entire world is in a moral panic and it makes me embarrassed to share the same oxygen as these people.
- AlecSchueler 3y ago> I didn't say they are This started when you said I was echoing her. > no, it isn't a strawman when that is literally the issue on the table. Congresswoman Eshoo... I am not Congresswoman Eshoo. I said nothing about a ban. I was making my own points from my own perspective and you've begun arguing against something that someone else has said and put me into their camp by saying I'm echoing them.
- w4ffl35 3y agoi really don't care. this conversation is going nowhere. Safetyism is for the weak, AI safetyism even more-so. "Think of the women" is a stupid argument.