3 ms·
One or two engines looked like they actually exploded in flight, it just kept going like nothing happened. Absolutely amazing.
by moffkalast 4y ago
One or two engines looked like they actually exploded in flight, it just kept going like nothing happened. Absolutely amazing.
- danpalmer 4y agoIt was great to see that they seemed unconcerned about 3 engines not lighting on launch. That's the sort of redundancy Starship is going to need to succeed in the way SpaceX are aiming for.
- moffkalast 4y agoWell they already had a 1 engine out capability on F9, so scaling that ratio to Starship would be 3.6 engines, so it may be that it was in tolerance.
- MaxikCZ 4y agoFor roughly 10 seconds the telemetry reported 5 failed engines, then the last engine to fail re-ignited. But from the photos it looks like a total of 6 engines were off for longer period of time, 5 at the outer rim and 1 of the inner 3. Thats 6 of 33 engines out, or 18.18%. Incredible it was still accelerating upwards
- RecycledEle 4y agoWhen 100% full of fuel, the stack has a thrust to weight ratio (TWR) of 1.5 (IIRC.)