3 ms·

That does not appear to be factual: https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-lagar/dokument/svensk-forfattningssamling/lag-2008717-om-signalspaning-i_sfs-2008-717 h

• SiempreViernes 4y ago
  What do you mean? Lag 2008:717 does not contain any provisions about forcing companies to log or store data. Rättegångsbalken does have a provision that a prosecutor can order you to preserve information you already have saved for a maximum of 180 days (https://lagen.nu/1942:740#K27P16S1 https://lagen.nu/1942:740#K27P16S1). I can't find anything about what the punishment for ignoring such an order would be, but to say a company could be forced to keep operating seems extraordinarily unfounded.
  • bragr 4y ago
    Try this one [1] which contains an obligation for operators to comply and maintain secrecy. I'm not a lawyer, and definitely not a swedish lawyer, but my point is, despite baked in protections, like most countries, Sweden seems to have a robust set of overlapping national security and surveillance laws. [1] https://lagen.nu/prop/2006/07:63 https://lagen.nu/prop/2006/07:63
    • hnarn 4y ago
      Mullvad is not an operator, and you’re moving the goal posts.
    • SiempreViernes 4y ago
      When you try to argue something is law, please have the decency to link to the actual law, you have linked a proposal and not the law as accepted by parliament.