13 ms·
> Because the whole point of the article is that there was no data to be compromised. AND they were able to convince the police and prosecutor of that!
by Ensorceled 4y ago
> Because the whole point of the article is that there was no data to be compromised.
AND they were able to convince the police and prosecutor of that!
- pc86 4y agoI have to wonder what would have happened had the same thing occurred in the US. I'm really struggling to think of a scenario where the police have a warrant that says "$THING is on computers at this company, go get them" and you have literally any chance of convincing them that $THING is not anywhere. I could see them taking all the computers then six months later saying "here you can have them back now, come pick them up at the precinct and here's the storage bill."
- tricolon 4y agoI would half expect them to sue the computers for obstruction of justice... and then just keep them.