4 ms·
I agree with you, but my understanding in briefly reading this case is that the plaintiff (via their 'lifelong friend' Mr. T. U.) interacted with Google; not a
by wildrhythms 4y ago
I agree with you, but my understanding in briefly reading this case is that the plaintiff (via their 'lifelong friend' Mr. T. U.) interacted with Google; not a judge with a ruling. But perhaps I'm missing some part of it.
The correspondence with Google begins at line [66]
http://citoyens.soquij.qc.ca/php/decision.php?ID=8DC675577FCB5A9703ACA18C78BF1609 http://citoyens.soquij.qc.ca/php/decision.php?ID=8DC675577FC...