> hold independent volunteers responsible iirc there is already a carveout for free open-source contributions, it only applies to (the very widely applicable)

> hold independent volunteers responsible iirc there is already a carveout for free open-source contributions, it only applies to (the very widely applicable) commercial activity. My understanding is, this letter is about developers organized as non-profits, but who are still paid for their work. One problem I got are package repositories publishing work and making money through other sources might be liable for all packages they host.