4 ms·
I've found Anthropic's Claude[1] to be far better for creative writing than GPT4 and even Claude+ [1] - https://poe.com/Claude-instant https://poe.com/Claude-i
by pmoriarty 4y ago
I've found Anthropic's Claude[1] to be far better for creative writing than GPT4 and even Claude+
[1] - https://poe.com/Claude-instant https://poe.com/Claude-instant
- hello_hny 4y agoSince when do you feel like this? I tested Turbo-Claude a month ago and wasn't impressed
- pmoriarty 4y agoI don't know what "Turbo-Claude" is, but, like I said, in my experience Claude+ is worse than plain Claude (aka "Claude-Instant") at writing creative works.
- antifa 4y agoI'd like to be presented with more information before a random website demands my phone number.
- pmoriarty 4y agoYou don't have to give it your phone number. All you need is an email.
- gwern 4y agoI really need to try Claude, but, well, so much to keep up with these days... FWIW, I've found that GPT-4 in the Playground is pretty good at creative text compared to ChatGPT-3, with a bit of prompting. It's still sometimes inflexible, but mostly works. (GPT-4 inherits a lot of the weaknesses of GPT-3 for creative text, unfortunately; you can fool yourself into thinking that it's genuinely learned to rhyme or what phonetics are, but underneath, it's still the same BPE-flaws.) I am still working on some projects there - I'm most excited about an experiment into translating John Milton's _Paradise Lost_ into contemporary alliterative English verse, using an inner-monologue approach to revise it line by line repeatedly: https://www.reddit.com/r/MachineLearning/comments/12pqqg6/discussion_translation_of_japanese_to_english/jgnvay6/ https://www.reddit.com/r/MachineLearning/comments/12pqqg6/di... Sample of intro 'translation': https://pastebin.com/WmHKD9RP https://pastebin.com/WmHKD9RP GPT-4 suggested titling it _Perished Paradise_, and I rather like it. :)