Thank you for a textbook example for denial by retreating into definitions yoga It’s not only textbook ‘confidently wrong’ (which is easy when you have strong

Thank you for a textbook example for denial by retreating into definitions yoga It’s not only textbook ‘confidently wrong’ (which is easy when you have strong opinions in a rapidly moving field) it also is a great counterpoint to ‘but LLMs hallucinate” because humans do that all the time too as seen here. Spoiler: - GPT4 can be given arbitrarily large long term memory via tools/plugins, vector stores, etc. It matters not whether that’s a feature of the model or an external tool made available to it, the result is the same. - It’s completely unbounded by what it was trained on because it can be given tools to access any data, from google to specialized databases. It matters not if it has that feature in the model or it was made available to it as an external tool - It can absolutely prioritize and plan, you literally just have to ask it and loop on itself. You missed LangChain and ChatGPT plug-ins to only name a few prioritization frameworks. - There is absolutely no evidence that it cannot be creative and plenty evidence to the contrary. To deny this one has to create a definition of creativity that excludes AI. With access to an almost infinite supply of cultural information, it can expose you to novel ideas reframed given the right set of tools and temperature. Sure we can pretend there is a universally accepted definition for AGI and even pretend it’s the one you have chosen - but it’s like arguing with a Taifoon on whether it’s a Hurricane. In terms of outcomes - all the same.