Anyone else think its an abuse of terminology to refer to speaker conditioning as "in-context learning" and "prompting" now? Like, using a reference encoder to

Anyone else think its an abuse of terminology to refer to speaker conditioning as "in-context learning" and "prompting" now? Like, using a reference encoder to condition on an unseen target speaker has been around for 4 or 5 years now. These results are already cool without mystifying the results by calling this "prompting" or "icl" Unless there is some subtle difference that warrants the new terminology?