3 ms·
Stephan Kinsella's talk "Intellectual Nonsense: Fallacious Arguments for IP", is a must watch. There's no reason to have IP law and in fact there is actually go
by breck 4y ago
Stephan Kinsella's talk "Intellectual Nonsense: Fallacious Arguments for IP", is a must watch. There's no reason to have IP law and in fact there is actually good reason to believe they stand on shaky legal ground.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e0RXfGGMGPE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e0RXfGGMGPE
One of the arguments he brings up is that the Constitution specifically says "To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts". It can be argued that IP law does not do this. In fact it does the opposite. As soon as you have a patent or copyright on something you are incentivized to not promote the progress of science and arts, at least not until your monopoly terms expire (which is never, with the copyright extensions).
- Animats 4y agoEven better, there's this report from the Republican Study Group, in 2012, recommending shorter copyright terms.[1] The staffer who wrote that was fired. [1] https://archive.org/details/RscThreeMythsAboutCopyrightLaw/ https://archive.org/details/RscThreeMythsAboutCopyrightLaw/