4 ms·
This measure of “fairness” merely impairs the utility of the data. Any standard based on puff-piece marketing is inherently garbage. There’s no research or poli
by inopinatus 4y ago
This measure of “fairness” merely impairs the utility of the data. Any standard based on puff-piece marketing is inherently garbage. There’s no research or policy value in dragging our thinking down to the same level.
Unsurprisingly, many of their taxonomies are 30-50% labelled “Other”, a common warning flag of either junk data or lazy classifications.
- lmcnulty 4y agoNote that the graphs on the taxonomy pages collapse labels outside the top nine under "all others." The incidents aren't literally labelled "other."