3 ms·
The translation reads a lot better for technical and non technical folks. NIST technical writers should take a look at this.
by javier_e06 3y ago
The translation reads a lot better for technical and non technical folks. NIST technical writers should take a look at this.
- Kalium 3y agoI disagree. It's a overly wordy and imprecise read for the kind of person who is the target audience (which is what "technical" means here). Further, this sort of translation only works on this particular snippet because it's an introduction and statement of purpose. The policy details would not translate nearly so well or coherently. You may as well request that IETF RFCs be rendered into lay language. You can do it, but it would likely make them much less useful as specifications.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]