3 ms·

Yeah, this site needs a clear definition of what is an AI upfront. Good luck with that.

• inopinatus 4y ago
  Their minimum standard for inclusion appears to be any collection of if-statements.
  • pfsalter 4y ago
    This is the same standard for any Startup claiming to leverage AI, so I think that's fair
    • inopinatus 4y ago
      This measure of “fairness” merely impairs the utility of the data. Any standard based on puff-piece marketing is inherently garbage. There’s no research or policy value in dragging our thinking down to the same level. Unsurprisingly, many of their taxonomies are 30-50% labelled “Other”, a common warning flag of either junk data or lazy classifications.
      • lmcnulty 4y ago
        Note that the graphs on the taxonomy pages collapse labels outside the top nine under "all others." The incidents aren't literally labelled "other."
  • MacsHeadroom 4y ago
    It's even more loose than that! There are "incidents" of production lines not meeting quotas, requiring more manual labor. I guess conveyor belts are AI.