3 ms·
> That is the whole crux of the problem. There is no driver, it was supposed to be self driving. Like many of the "self-driving taxis" in San Francisco whose pa
by dale_glass 4y ago
> That is the whole crux of the problem. There is no driver, it was supposed to be self driving. Like many of the "self-driving taxis" in San Francisco whose passengers might not even have a driving license.
We have the internet. For such a problem, call the home base, have a remote operator figure it out.
> Not good enough. All those human driven cars handled the situation is seconds. Now all your "self-driving" cars are causing a huge traffic jam. In the meanwhile the police has just open a second lane for the human driven cars to overtake the AI ones....
I don't imagine we're going to have fully autonomous cars any time soon. There will need to be a human in the loop somewhere.
On a longer term, I can see a police officer having some sort of device or signal, hopefully authenticated, to give the car an understandable command.
- belter 4y ago> We have the internet. For such a problem, call the home base, have a remote operator figure it out. So is self driving possible or not?
- yellowapple 4y agoSelf-driving is a spectrum, not an absolute.
- dale_glass 4y agoTo a very substantial level. Everything needs maintenance and monitoring. My web server runs on its own 99.9% of the time, but I'm still needed