4 ms·
You have significantly more faith in the market than I. > People who have money will always pay a premium for quality. The assumption here is that the Venn of
by lucideer 4y ago
You have significantly more faith in the market than I.
> People who have money will always pay a premium for quality.
The assumption here is that the Venn of "people who have money" and "people who can recognise / care about quality" is closer to a circle than a figure eight - that has not been my experience.
- qikInNdOutReply 4y agoIt also assumes that quality can not be archieved with chat gpt via quantity. Like "Make me 20 webpages with this topic", then let them test & evaluate by amazon clickwork, then regenerate with the base of the best 3 till quality goal is reached.
- lucideer 4y agoHa. Well, yeah - I guess we're even calling into question the very definition of the word quality here. Your comment seems to imply that quality is a metric that correlates with quantitative metrics of mass appeal, rather than personal & individually diverse concepts of subjective quality, which would be more what I was referring to. But both can be equally valid given the context.
- WalterSear 4y agoMore importantly, it assumes that this week's LLM is the last one ever, ignoring the improvements and iterations we are seeing on what feels like an hourly basis.