3 ms·
> There's not enough newsworthy things to cover in that time There is seriously no end to the number of newsworthy things to cover. The problem is that there a
by naravara 4y ago
> There's not enough newsworthy things to cover in that time
There is seriously no end to the number of newsworthy things to cover. The problem is that there are limited resources for coverage. It's expensive to staff a desk full of people who can find interesting topics and tell good stories about them for every subject area under the sun. It takes a lot of people with very variegated kinds of subject matter expertise.
It's much cheaper to have 4 or 5 people whose main skills are theater criticism level analysis of political events (i.e. how does this play with various demographics) and a skill of manipulating emotions to spend all their time speculating over nonsense instead. Just put them in a suit and have somber music on and we can pretend this is a serious matter instead of idle gossip.
- rqtwteye 4y ago"There is seriously no end to the number of newsworthy things to cover." Not when it also needs to be "entertaining". When you watch Fox, CNN and others they convey almost zero information about actual issues but only emotion and opinion.
- naravara 4y agoWhat makes something entertaining or not isn't necessarily a property of the topic. I think you just need an expert who is a good communicator and really enthusiastic about the thing to help you understand why it's cool or important or interesting. The trouble is there are only so many Carl Sagan level people to go around.