3 ms·
The reproduction of life can never be meaningful by itself, in part because a single life is already countless moments and the problem is the same. I think wha
by quonn 4y ago
The reproduction of life can never be meaningful by itself, in part because a single life is already countless moments and the problem is the same.
I think what you perhaps want to point at is the opposite: the fact that _a_ life is finite and therefore things worth doing/things that are meaningful look beyond that - and the wider they look the more meaningful they can be.
- shanebellone 4y ago"therefore things worth doing/things that are meaningful look beyond that - and the wider they look the more meaningful they can be." Are "meaningful things" qualified by the persistence of their consequence?
- quonn 4y agoNot necessarily, so I wrote „wide“. By wide I mean wide in space and conceptually this also extends to wide in time. So there is are multiple positions in space at the current time and likewise there are multiple positions in the future and they all equivalently can be touched or not.