> You just gave another false dichotomy. No, I didn't. Notice how I used words like "might", implying that the scenario I described is but one of many plausibl

> You just gave another false dichotomy. No, I didn't. Notice how I used words like "might", implying that the scenario I described is but one of many plausible scenarios. Certainly corporations contribute code to BSD-licensed projects. But equally certain is the fact that some corporations contribute code to GPL-licensed projects when they otherwise would have kept their code to themselves if they weren't legally compelled to open it.