Yes, I read the link. I felt it was only right to allow the best of both sides to be heard on this one. "Suspect at best" is really not a fair takeaway, unless

Yes, I read the link. I felt it was only right to allow the best of both sides to be heard on this one. "Suspect at best" is really not a fair takeaway, unless you're cherry-picking quotes at face value. Myself, I found the responses to the paper rely on bluster and don't hold much water at all. If you want to see the responses taken apart, with more on the abysmal state of voting machines and the untrustworthy sounding electoral folk responsible, you can read this: https://www.counterpunch.org/2016/05/16/clinton-does-best-where-voting-machines-flunk-hacking-tests-hillary-clinton-vs-bernie-sanders-election-fraud-allegations/ https://www.counterpunch.org/2016/05/16/clinton-does-best-wh...