3 ms·
Difficult to read when the time is only stable for such a short period. What if the time emerged from the depths of the scene already assembled, only to crumbl
by yrro 4y ago
Difficult to read when the time is only stable for such a short period.
What if the time emerged from the depths of the scene already assembled, only to crumble to dust as its moment passes?
- Kiro 4y agoNo, this is much better and don't you dare question Oimo's design choices ever again. They don't need suggestions from mere mortals like us.
- yrro 4y agoHey I still thought it was cool
- Kiro 4y agoI think the coolest thing is the assembly itself, which wouldn't be the case with your idea even if it would be more readable. I apologize for being rude with my joke but their stuff (https://oimo.io/works https://oimo.io/works) is so mind-blowing that I just want to let them do their thing and fully embrace their vision without external interference.
- yrro 4y agoNo worries. I too find these demos incredible. More so that they don't make my entire computer freeze up like most WebGL content!
- seabass-labrax 4y ago> What if the time emerged from the depths of the scene already assembled, only to crumble to dust as its moment passes? I feel as if there could be some profound metaphor there...
- kraquepype 4y agoI came to say the same thing, but that was me looking at it's practicality as a clock. If you zone out a bit and watch, you can see each tick form the time and quickly collapse, drawing a parallel to the nervous ephemeral nature of life. Being able to get that feeling from a clock is pretty neat.
- Etherlord87 4y agoSince those numbers don't assemble from previous numbers, they could as well start assembling earlier. Apparently the designer thinks it's visible long enough (he's wrong).