I think it seems pretty reasonable. If someone tries to use their broadband on multiple occasions and more often than not doesn't get the advertised typical spe

I think it seems pretty reasonable. If someone tries to use their broadband on multiple occasions and more often than not doesn't get the advertised typical speed, then it's not typical, and a court should agree with that. I don't really like the idea of making regulation too technical or specific. "Typical" is a good word here.