3 ms·
He did say "a bunch of tweaks". 150 lines of tweaks for the theme alone: https://github.com/xenodium/dotsies/blob/790465b1824481b81bf5c6e08949128c13d76f95/emacs
by illiarian 3y ago
He did say "a bunch of tweaks". 150 lines of tweaks for the theme alone: https://github.com/xenodium/dotsies/blob/790465b1824481b81bf5c6e08949128c13d76f95/emacs/features/fe-ui.el#L42 https://github.com/xenodium/dotsies/blob/790465b1824481b81bf...
- 3836293648 3y agoI tried the tweaks too. It still looks nothing like it
- illiarian 3y agoThe other add-ons, changes and additions probably play a role, too. On a personal note this is one of the things I disliked about emacs, too: its configs are non-deterministic :) You find a nice config somewhere, or do the same changes,... and your emacs still looks and behaves differently.
- natrys 3y agoSounds like all these starter packs need to use purely functional package managers like straight.el (or the newer elpaca) who has the ability to pin to exact commit hash of the third party packages. Afaik, Doom Emacs does exactly that, and it doesn't have such reproducibility issues? Theoretically, another source of deviation might be different distros shipping different builds of Emacs using different flags, resulting in things like different graphics backend (like GTK vs pure X11). I am not sure if this is a legitimate concern in practice, but using something like Nix or Guix might eliminate even that.
- xenodium 3y agoOP here. The linked tweaks are straight from my config. I can try help work out why it doesn’t look the same for ya. Would need to see your elisp snippets. May be easier to discuss on GitHub. Maybe open an issue on https://github.com/xenodium/dotsies https://github.com/xenodium/dotsies