> I also think that by the time vendors are implementing other vendors prefixes, they should just be pushing to drop the prefix, that is the point I think tant

> I also think that by the time vendors are implementing other vendors prefixes, they should just be pushing to drop the prefix, that is the point I think tantek advocates this approach, but in a different order. First make sure you can support the feature without a prefix, and then support both. tantek: One possible proposal is to only parse other vendors' prefixes in conjunction with parsing unprefixed. tantek: e.g. with -webkit-transform. We wouldn't parse that until we also parse transform