4 ms·
> Now, I definitely prefer the US's stance of a password being illegal self-discrimination Is that true though? Never heard that before.
by sdfghswe 4y ago
> Now, I definitely prefer the US's stance of a password being illegal self-discrimination
Is that true though? Never heard that before.
- NoMoreNicksLeft 4y agoIt's somewhat up in the air. The prevailing theory is that the 5th protects against compelling what amounts to testimony... but it's only been tested a few times in court, never by SCOTUS. With mixed results.
- sdfghswe 4y agoIs there a way I can learn more about this? A resource for non-lawyers.
- P_I_Staker 4y agobtw, I think OP meant incrimination
- sdfghswe 4y agoI understood what he meant, and in fact I even missed the typo until you pointed it out.