4 ms·
You simply need the system to train itself on its own interactions, like how search engines improve results by counting clicks.
by svachalek 4y ago
You simply need the system to train itself on its own interactions, like how search engines improve results by counting clicks.
- lcnPylGDnU4H9OF 4y agoI'm not wondering about how the system will determine what's most helpful but instead determining what's even "correct". A model will learn what's "correct" from Stack Overflow by finding accepted or highly-voted answers but when it can't find such content anymore (in this case because Stack Overflow is hypothetically gone) then what would even exist to generate these discussions to be used as training data? Github, per the sibling comment, is a good example because projects will have issues (tied to the individual repository of source code to be seen as a working implementation of the idea) which will be where such discussions happen.
- LawTalkingGuy 4y agoThose topics that AI replaces the forums for won't need discussion. People won't be confused about that thing because the coding AI knows the details of it. Soon that'll be most syntax questions, soon simple to mid-level algorithms, etc. People will move on to higher-level questions.
- ok_dad 4y agoWhen Google search became important, people structured their information so that Google could best index it. When AIs become important in the same way, people will start to structure their information so that a particular class of AI can best index it. If that involves API documentation, perhaps there will be a standard format that AIs understand the best.
- stygiansonic 4y agoThe difference is that folks had an incentive to make their pages easily indexable: drive page views. With becoming training data the incentive to the creators is a little less clear
- ok_dad 4y agoYea right now sure. Later, there will be a clear incentive. Or not, if AI fails to become useful.
- melagonster 4y agolook the condition of artists, haha :(