29 ms·
So, you’re saying that Coinbase knowingly offered unregistered security. And acknowledged that’s not legal. The fact the SEC refuses these securities to be regi
by dgellow 4y ago
So, you’re saying that Coinbase knowingly offered unregistered security. And acknowledged that’s not legal. The fact the SEC refuses these securities to be registered doesn’t negate the illegal offering of unregistered securities.
- daedalus_f 4y agoIf you look at the recent SEC filing, they present evidence Coinbase likely knew what they were doing was illegal and coached companies wanting to list coins on the exchange on how to remove “problematic language” from their promotional material that might make it too obvious they were selling unregistered securities.
- dgellow 4y agoYeah, I cannot really see how they can defend their position here. That will be an interesting case to follow, Coinbase legal team will have to be _creative_.
- dlubarov 4y agoWhere is this filing? Not sure what that would be since the SEC hasn't brought charges yet. I don't see an issue with advising companies on what language to use, given that language can absolutely affect whether a token is in fact a security, e.g. based on the "expectation of profit" prong of the Howey test.
- fallingknife 4y agoAdvising people that you do business with to not do certain things because you think they might violate the law is not the smoking gun that you think it is.