> Not all of them, but some. Perhaps 10%. Just listen to what you're saying: - GPT isn't at human level because GPT isn't able to invent something new - Not

> Not all of them, but some. Perhaps 10%. Just listen to what you're saying: - GPT isn't at human level because GPT isn't able to invent something new - Not all programmers invent something new, but some. Perhaps 10% I'm pretty sure this implies literally that 90% programmers aren't human level. The lengths to which people are willing to go to dismiss GPT's abilities is mind boggling to me.