3 ms·
Useful for form of learning and experimentation. Not applicable, in my view, at all due to lack of ownership of the generated code. There is no ability to copyr
by nbzso 3y ago
Useful for form of learning and experimentation. Not applicable, in my view, at all due to lack of ownership of the generated code. There is no ability to copyright and protect the intellectual output from generative AI processes.
Even when your prompts are clearly the pseudocode which creates the scope of the generated response. Until this situation is legally cleared, I will be very cautious to include LLM's outside rapid prototyping and conceptual phase. Not to mention the madness of AutoGPT or more realistic approach of LangChain.
It is early in the game and the Hype train is riding more rapidly than crypto and web3 combined.
I see a lot of AI startups introducing the same capabilities through OpenAI API and prompts, without consideration of prompt injection risk. So we will see who will survive.