> something something NP-hard. Yes, in general. But the usual limits of "bounded rationality" make that result basically irrelevant. Most people don't have a m

> something something NP-hard. Yes, in general. But the usual limits of "bounded rationality" make that result basically irrelevant. Most people don't have a myriad strong beliefs. The problem is more like "the 10 commandments are inconsistent" and not that "Rawls' reflective equilibrium might not converge".