3 ms·
Our experience with BitBucket in the Netherlands has been that it's slow, almost as bad as Jira. I also found the ways things like the PR interface and Markdown
by difosfor 3y ago
Our experience with BitBucket in the Netherlands has been that it's slow, almost as bad as Jira. I also found the ways things like the PR interface and Markdown support etc to be lackluster with third party support for things like semantic-release lacking and painful. We haven't been affected by Github outages in the last 5 or so years that we've switched to that, so I'm happy we did.
TL;DR: Perhaps the levels of service vary per region?
- mrweasel 3y agoAs someone who used Jira and BitBucket quite a bit: The mistake was using the cloud version. It's really a shame that Atlassian have price almost everyone out of their self-hosted solutions, because those where always much faster. I'm sure that Atlassian understands the business case better than I do, but I just don't see the point of their offerings when I can't afford on-prem. The main selling point for us was always: "We do not want this data on any servers we do not control, and Atlassian products allows us to do that". Now you need to be able to afford a data center licens, and I can't imagine those sell to well, other that to existing customers who now have no choice.