4 ms·
Signal, WhatsApp, Element and More Unite Against the UK Online Safety Bill
- azalemeth 4y agoThe open letter itself can be found here, for example: https://nitter.nl/signalapp/status/1648117518291308544 https://nitter.nl/signalapp/status/1648117518291308544 I really hope the house of lords see sense. I like my encryption not fundamentally broken...
- Arathorn 4y agoalso https://element.io/blog/the-uks-online-safety-bill-undermines-everyones-safety/ https://element.io/blog/the-uks-online-safety-bill-undermine... on the Element side, https://getsession.org/blog/open-letter-uk-online-safety-bill https://getsession.org/blog/open-letter-uk-online-safety-bil... on the Session side…
- anthk 4y agoUse a Tox client for Android and F-Droid. Fdroid Classic it's better, it has a grid based layout which is easier to render on old devices. Install Braid for emergencies too. If some authoritiy ask, tell them you have Braid as a fallback on national disasters, because it works over Bluetooth too.
- catoc 4y agoI never understand the thought process here. If you ban or cripple encryption by demanding backdoors, criminals will just use "illegal" real encryption and the rest of us will be stuck with unsafe "encryption" susceptible to mass surveillance and forementioned criminals. Explain the gain for society without using the words "terrorism" or "child porn"
- notRobot 4y agoThe target of these laws isn't actually criminals, it's the masses. Criminals are just the justification they use.
- Laaas 4y agoIf encryption is illegal, then hiding your crimes by using encryption might carry a big punishment regardless of what you're hiding. If you made the punishment of using encryption death, criminals would likely not use encryption for anything but the most heinous crimes.
- valdiorn 4y agoExactly this. This is also how gun control in the UK works. In the UK, possessing a firearm is already a greater offense than most of the crimes you could commit with that firearm, shy of actually shooting/killing someone. This is also why I laugh when people say cryptocurrencies can't be banned. Of course they can be. It's an order of magnitude easier to prove someone has access to or owns cryptocurrencies than it is to prove they used that crypto to commit a crime. (Back to cryptoGRAPHY) - this is probably what they're going for - it's very difficult to prove you used encryption software to exchange information on criminal activities, so instead they just make the act of encrypting stuff illegal. The problem is; cryptography is everywhere, and is a fundamental part of how the modern world works. Trying to ban it isn't possible without breaking things like corporate VPNs, etc. - things that every day normal people will MISS. Ban strong encryption apps? You can literally just set up a VPS, SSH into it and use the "write" Unix command on the server locally. If the government can crack that you've lost all security on the internet.