4 ms·
I don’t think so. I’ve seen countless threads and front page articles about more bike-friendly, anti-car city development, as well as how suburban and rural ci
by jader201 4y ago
I don’t think so.
I’ve seen countless threads and front page articles about more bike-friendly, anti-car city development, as well as how suburban and rural cities requiring cars and more driving is definitely not a good thing.
It’s very hard to find anyone coming to defense of the allure of smaller, more open developments with actual land between your neighbors.
If you want to find rural or suburban folks, HN is not the community to engage with.
- briantakita 4y agoI'm into rural living myself. Spent enough time in cities & suburbs to appreciate wide open spaces without nosy neighbors & HOA rules. I also appreciate cars & the freedom they enable. Re: anti-car people, one thing that is not acknowledged about America is that America is very large & people like having their own land. Public transportation is not a feasible option for mountain communities, low population density areas, & quiet areas with nature. I was also attacked, though I got away, while riding my bike from BART in Hayward coming home from work. Havn't rode much public transportation since that experience. Public transportation is often in high crime areas. Car accidents do happen, so there's danger there as well. I only had accidents in urban areas. Stressful conditions coupled with bad driving practices I suppose.
- hooverd 4y agoTo paraphrase Bill Gates, "nobody needs more than 640 square feet".
- ghaff 4y agoBecause so many of urbanite anti-car commenters are so strident that there’s very little point in engaging with them. (HN probably is younger which tends to correlate with more urban these days but it’s generally not worth trying to have certain discussions that will change no one’s mind.) As a peer commented if you live in Silicon Valley, among other places, you live in the suburbs even if you can maybe walk to a few places.