> According to consequentialism, we should act to maximize good consequences. According to longtermism, we should act to benefit the long-term future. If either

> According to consequentialism, we should act to maximize good consequences. According to longtermism, we should act to benefit the long-term future. If either is correct, then it would be morally good to destroy Earth to seed a new, life-supporting universe. After such an illogical, non sequitur intro, I'm surprised that this is being upvoted.