> you need 2.67TB of disk space The data looks like it should compress pretty well. If you use something like btrfs's transparent compression, I wouldn't be su

> you need 2.67TB of disk space The data looks like it should compress pretty well. If you use something like btrfs's transparent compression, I wouldn't be surprised if it all fit in less than 0.75TB of disk space while still being usable to any tool that expects uncompressed data. Edit: It looks like some of this data is already compressed, so maybe not.