It is possible that GP meant that Altman’s word is basically worthless to them, in which case that’s not something that can be argued about. It’s a factually tr

It is possible that GP meant that Altman’s word is basically worthless to them, in which case that’s not something that can be argued about. It’s a factually true statement that that is their opinion of that man. I personally can see why someone could arrive at that position. As you’ve pointed out, taking Sam Altman at face value can involve suppositions about how much he values his credibility, how much stock OpenAI competitors put in his public statements, and the mindsets people in general have when reading what he writes.