3 ms·
I'm not sure that definition is relevant; it's too extreme to apply to the situation. By that definition the US censors speech such as incitement to violence,
by wolverine876 4y ago
I'm not sure that definition is relevant; it's too extreme to apply to the situation.
By that definition the US censors speech such as incitement to violence, fraud, slander, and intellectual property. No place has ever been uncensored.
Like everything in life, there's a matter of degree to it and a question of what is censored.
- MacsHeadroom 4y agoThe US government does not remove instances of incitement to violence, fraud, or slander, and most intellectual property law is probably unconstitutional but that's a different issue.
- wolverine876 4y agoIt does. Courts can require information to be removed, the executive branch can sieze servers, etc. > most intellectual property law is probably unconstitutional Exceptional claims require exceptional evidence.