5 ms·
Valuable processing info in the comments. But why so much effort to produce something without the option to have ownership (copyright) over my product? If I dr
by nbzso 3y ago
Valuable processing info in the comments. But why so much effort to produce something without the option to have ownership (copyright) over my product?
If I draw a strange line with any digital painting tool and put a circle and a square around, I sign this art and this is my Art.
If a spend a day with prompting, upscaling, fixing with Control net in the end of the day I will have a funny picture which is not mine.
https://fortune.com/2023/02/23/no-copyright-images-made-ai-artificial-intelligence/ https://fortune.com/2023/02/23/no-copyright-images-made-ai-a...
- efreak 3y agoSome of us don't care about ownership. You could ask the same question of anyone contributing to open source projects
- nbzso 3y agoThis is a different use case. Why? Because you make a conscious decision to donate your work. The models which are used for image generating (Midjourney, Stable Diffusion) are full of scraped data without consent from the authors. From this point of view, Adobe Firefly is obviously ahead: "The current Firefly generative AI model is trained on a dataset of Adobe Stock, along with openly licensed work and public domain content where copyright has expired. As Firefly evolves, Adobe is exploring ways for creators to be able to train the machine learning model with their own assets, so they can generate content that matches their unique style, branding, and design language without the influence of other creators’ content. Adobe will continue to listen to and work with the creative community to address future developments to the Firefly training models." So the only way forward to have an ownership of your product is to train your own models over your own data.