2 ms·

You are invested enough in this story to comment on it. You said that credit for your ideas was stolen and you seem to have projected your own problems onto the

You are invested enough in this story to comment on it. You said that credit for your ideas was stolen and you seem to have projected your own problems onto the Montañez story. When challenged, you took refuge behind the fallibility of human memory, race, gender, and medical problems. On the other hand, you went into this thinking the world was one way and found out it was somehow different in this case (unless your take-away was just "sour grapes").

DoreenMichele 3y ago
you seem to have projected your own problems onto the Montañez story No, I haven't. You seem to be -- like many other people here -- determined to believe that I am "on his side" because I don't agree with your conclusions. I've stated repeatedly that the interviews were decades after the fact, I don't feel it's possible to know exactly what happened and I just know too much about how human bias influences conclusions in spite of all the evidence. Truth often has little to do with what groups of people agree is the correct narrative. That absolutely does not mean "I am totally on his side and it's the other 20 people who are liars, I'm sure of it!" I don't intend to comment further. This whole thing just seems bizarre to me.