3 ms·
> So what does that change? They either have big impact or they don't. Society isn't a subject. It shouldn't be treated like such, and no arbitrary organisatio
by golergka 4y ago
> So what does that change? They either have big impact or they don't.
Society isn't a subject. It shouldn't be treated like such, and no arbitrary organisation should assume the role of it's representative.
- AlecSchueler 4y agoWhere did the role of representative come into it? It's more a question of them being accountable for their responsibility, even if (especially if?) that responsibility is bestowed unto them by the public/the market.
- golergka 4y agoYou don't become responsible for something just because you have influence for it. You can only assume responsibility voluntarily by entering a relationship with somebody, a concrete subject, which society isn't.
- AlecSchueler 4y agoI disagree completely but I can understand there are cultural differences place to place in terms of individual responsibility within the collective.
- golergka 4y agoThere is no collective until a person chooses to become a part of one.