4 ms·
> Impact they have on society is based on completely voluntary interactions by millions of users. S So what does that change? They either have big impact or th
by AlecSchueler 4y ago
> Impact they have on society is based on completely voluntary interactions by millions of users. S
So what does that change? They either have big impact or they don't.
> I can't see how a reasonable human being would possibly advocate for something so amoral.
Maybe you should look at some parliamentary discussions from the countries that already legislate for business transparency in these cases and see why they came to the positions they came to?
- golergka 4y ago> So what does that change? They either have big impact or they don't. Society isn't a subject. It shouldn't be treated like such, and no arbitrary organisation should assume the role of it's representative.
- AlecSchueler 4y agoWhere did the role of representative come into it? It's more a question of them being accountable for their responsibility, even if (especially if?) that responsibility is bestowed unto them by the public/the market.
- golergka 4y agoYou don't become responsible for something just because you have influence for it. You can only assume responsibility voluntarily by entering a relationship with somebody, a concrete subject, which society isn't.
- AlecSchueler 4y agoI disagree completely but I can understand there are cultural differences place to place in terms of individual responsibility within the collective.
- golergka 4y agoThere is no collective until a person chooses to become a part of one.