3 ms·
> But now, with the AI integration, even when I tried it and left disappointed, Bing is starting to sound interesting. When I try a new feature, and am disappo
by htag 3y ago
> But now, with the AI integration, even when I tried it and left disappointed, Bing is starting to sound interesting.
When I try a new feature, and am disappointed, I think marketing overhyped it and lose interest. Why do you think ChatGPT + Search is a good combo, even after you were disappointed when trying it?
- qwertox 3y agoThey are showing that they have a strong interest in including it. Sure, it still isn't where I'd like it to be, but what does Google have to offer? Bard is US-only, so not reachable for me, I don't even know how or if it is integrated into Google Search. They'd have a bigger potential in enriching their search with AI features, better search, probably a better AI. At least from what they have been publishing during these past two years, they seem to have gathered a lot of experience with AI. In regards to Bing, I felt like you.com had a slightly better AI integration. What ChatGPT lacks are links to related websites. For example, give me a links to the documentation of the `.into()` trait [0] instead of "only" explaining it to me. [0] https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/convert/trait.Into.html https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/convert/trait.Into.html
- hbn 3y ago> What ChatGPT lacks are links to related websites. For example, give me a links to the documentation of the `.into()` trait [0] instead of "only" explaining it to me. In the recent announcement for plugins they showed off a web browsing plugin that allows ChatGPT to search the web, read content, and return results with sources cited. https://openai.com/blog/chatgpt-plugins#browsing https://openai.com/blog/chatgpt-plugins#browsing