HN'ers: Thanks! What a difference a title makes. Last week's article was more of an anti-software-patent screed, and ended with a vague statement about copyrig

HN'ers: Thanks! What a difference a title makes. Last week's article was more of an anti-software-patent screed, and ended with a vague statement about copyright. I got some feedback and realized the copyright part looked thrown in (which it was), and I took it out. That doesn't mean that copyright isn't well worth discussing, but I haven't spent as much time on that part of the law. This week's article is more focused on a specific issue, which would make a huge difference in the patent landscape. AMA.