The critique of FAT made in this article is convincing but easily remedied. The paper obliquely argues that FAT does not evaluate the outcome itself, merely of

The critique of FAT made in this article is convincing but easily remedied. The paper obliquely argues that FAT does not evaluate the outcome itself, merely offering tools to validate the route to that outcome. Therefore I propose that FAT is extended with an extra criteria - that of Reasonableness...