3 ms·
> Now we need another kind of freedom, we feel it but cannot articulate it. Simple: empower the user. Focus on the user's freedom to do things. I think FSF's
by rollcat 4y ago
> Now we need another kind of freedom, we feel it but cannot articulate it.
Simple: empower the user. Focus on the user's freedom to do things.
I think FSF's goals can be easily rephrased in terms of that "new" freedom, while remaining consistent with the original vision.
I also think this is where free software is failing very hard in the recent decades. I was running Debian+SailfishOS as my daily drivers up until 2019, when I completely switched to the Apple ecosystem, after one simple realisation: it empowered me and granted me the freedom to do more with my devices.
There is no intrinsic reason why Apple is better at empowering their users than FOSS is, I think it's the exact opposite: FOSS as a principle and as a development practice has proven over and over again that it can compete with, and even take out proprietary juggernauts - in spaces other than personal computing.
I have on my desk (just for fun) a PowerBook G4 (2001) with OSX 10.5 (2007), and I think that machine + OS is still ahead in usability vs a modern release of KDE or Gnome.
I don't know, I don't think bridging that gap is impossible, but that might require unthinkable compromises like acknowledging the need for proprietary Wifi firmware, CPU microcode, or single sign-on for Google/Outlook/iCloud mail and calendar. So I'm not sure if it will ever happen.