4 ms·
This is sort of interesting, because normally people want GPT to suppress fringe views (ex, the vast body of evidence and literature is pro-vaccine, and they do
by justrealist 4y ago
This is sort of interesting, because normally people want GPT to suppress fringe views (ex, the vast body of evidence and literature is pro-vaccine, and they don't want it to promote low-evidence anti-vaccine views). But in this case, the fringe story is, by consensus on HN, the correct one despite the mindshare.
How do you generalize this principle?
- bazoom42 4y ago> How do you generalize this principle? Look at evidence rather than at how many people belive something?
- justrealist 4y agoPeople don't do this.
- paleotrope 4y agoNeither does GPT
- ddj231 4y agoI guess the question is whether GPT is supposed to be an emulation of personhood or simply a software tool. Ex. I don’t think we’d want a software tool that lies, steals or cheats despite the fact that people do this