3 ms·
>Most legitimate pushback I've seen has been more on the non-consensual training of models Look at the pushback to Adobe’s model. “Non consent of model input”
by whywhywhywhy 4y ago
>Most legitimate pushback I've seen has been more on the non-consensual training of models
Look at the pushback to Adobe’s model.
“Non consent of model input” is just a tool they’re using in the hopes of destroying the tech. Plenty of companies have datasets of these same people’s work where the T&C permits training.
The narrative will switch once you can no longer use the “stealing/consent” argument. They won’t suddenly become fine with this tech just because the dataset consented.
- therealcamino 4y agoIf their own work isn't hoovered up en masse, I'm sure that artists still won't be happy that they can no longer make a living from their profession. But it's a bit rich to think they're being disingenuous in objecting to their own work being co-opted to enable the process of putting them out of work.
- whywhywhywhy 4y agoI don’t think it’s rich at all. You saw the argument switch within minutes when Adobe Firefly launched. It’s not about the process it’s what legal and social levers can be pulled to stop the tech. I work in the creative fields so my work will be impacted by this but I realize it’s pointless to fight it.