> Semantic MathML is not useful Earlier, you said it was both nonsense and unlikely to ever work. Now you say it is not useful. You are moving the goal posts.

> Semantic MathML is not useful Earlier, you said it was both nonsense and unlikely to ever work. Now you say it is not useful. You are moving the goal posts. Your comments have had a mix of thoughtful examples (thanks) with some exaggeration and rant. I'm trying to tease these apart, but it isn't easy. I can see you have a strong negative reaction to Semantic MathML, but so far, your writing hasn't been persuasive.